|
|
Return preparer fraud generally
involves the preparation and filing of false income tax
returns by preparers who claim inflated personal or
business expenses, false deductions, unallowable credits
or excessive exemptions on returns prepared for their
clients. Preparers may manipulate income figures to
fraudulently obtain tax credits, such as the Earned
Income Tax Credit.
In some situations, the client, or
taxpayer, may not have knowledge of the false expenses,
deductions, exemptions and/or credits shown on his or
her tax return.
However, when the IRS detects the
false return, the taxpayer ? not the return preparer ?
must pay the additional taxes and interest and may be
subject to penalties.
The IRS Return Preparer Program
focuses on enhancing compliance in the return-preparer
community by investigating and referring criminal
activity by return preparers to the Department of
Justice for prosecution and/or asserting appropriate
civil penalties against unscrupulous return preparers.
While most preparers provide
excellent service to their clients, the IRS urges
taxpayers to be very careful when choosing a tax
preparer. Taxpayers should be as careful as they would
be in choosing a doctor or a lawyer. It is important to
know that even if someone else prepares a tax return, it
is the taxpayer who is ultimately responsible for all
the information on the tax return.
Helpful Hints When Choosing a
Return Preparer
-
Be cautious of tax preparers
who claim they can obtain larger refunds than
other preparers.
-
Avoid preparers who base
their fee on a percentage of the amount of the
refund.
-
Use a reputable tax
professional who signs your tax return and
provides you with a copy for your records.
-
Consider whether the
individual or firm will be around to answer
questions about the preparation of your tax
return months, or even years, after the return
has been filed.
-
Review your return before you
sign it and ask questions on entries you don't
understand.
-
No matter who prepares your
tax return, you, the taxpayer, are ultimately
responsible for all of the information on your
tax return. Therefore, never sign a blank tax
form.
-
Find out the person?s
credentials. Only attorneys, certified public
accountants (CPAs) and enrolled agents can
represent taxpayers before the IRS in all
matters including audits, collection and
appeals. Other return preparers may only
represent taxpayers for audits of returns they
actually prepared.
-
Find out if the preparer is
affiliated with a professional organization that
provides its members with continuing education
and resources and holds them to a code of
ethics.
-
Ask questions. Do you know
anyone who has used the tax professional? Were
they satisfied with the service they received?
Reputable preparers will ask to see
your receipts and will ask you multiple questions to
determine your qualifications for expenses, deductions
and other items. By doing so, they are trying to help
you avoid penalties, interest or additional taxes that
could result from an IRS examination.
Further, tax evasion is a risky
crime, a felony, punishable by five years imprisonment
and a $250,000 fine.
|
Criminal Investigation Statistical Information
on Return Preparer Fraud |
|
|
FY2007 |
FY2006 |
FY2005 |
|
Investigations Initiated |
218 |
197 |
248 |
|
Prosecution
Recommendations |
196 |
153 |
140 |
|
Indictments/Informations |
131 |
135 |
119 |
|
Sentenced |
123 |
109 |
118 |
|
Incarceration
Rate* |
81.3% |
89.0% |
85.6% |
|
Average
Months to Serve |
19 |
18 |
18 |
*Incarceration may include prison time, home
confinement, electronic monitoring or a combination.
Criminal and Civil Legal
Actions
Some return preparers have been
convicted of, or have pleaded guilty to, felony charges.
Additionally, the courts have issued
more than 255 permanent injunctions against abusive tax
scheme promoters and abusive return preparers since
2003. The following case summaries are excerpts from
public record documents on file in the court records in
the judicial district in which the legal actions were
filed.
Miami Return Preparer
Sentenced for Telephone Excise Tax Fraud
On Aug. 20, 2007, in Miami, Fla.,
Equilla McRae, aka Equilla Edwards, aka Equilla Givens,
was sentenced to 21 months in prison, followed by three
years of supervised release and ordered to perform 250
hours of community service in each of those years of
supervised release. In addition, McRae was ordered to
pay $179,369 in restitution to the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS). In June 2007, McRae pleaded guilty to one
count of making and presenting fraudulent federal income
tax refund claims to the IRS. According to the
indictment, McRae prepared, filed and assisted others in
preparing and filing approximately 25 fraudulent income
tax returns that resulted in fraudulent tax refund
claims, including fraudulent telephone excise tax refund
(TETR) credits, of approximately $142,265. The TETR is a
one-time credit available on 2006 income tax returns
designed to refund previously-collected federal excise
taxes on long-distance telephone service paid from March
2003 through June 2006.
Former New York Tax Preparer
Sentenced for Tax Fraud and Ordered to Pay $1.2 Million
On June 6, 2007, in White Plains,
N.Y., Glen Robins was sentenced to 30 months in prison
and ordered to pay $1.2 million in restitution to the
Internal Revenue Service for tax fraud conspiracy.
Robins, a tax preparer, pleaded guilty in February 2007,
admitting that he conspired to falsify expenses on his
clients? partnership returns. The fictitious expenses
created losses for the partnerships and those losses
fraudulently reduced his clients? tax liability. He also
admitted that he conspired to take fraudulent deductions
for contributions to self-employment retirement plans.
In addition, Robins admitted to submitting false tax
returns for himself and his own partnerships.
Former Income Tax Preparer
Sentenced to 36 Months in Prison
On May 29, 2007, in Shreveport, La.,
Paulius D. Pitts was sentenced to 36 months in prison,
one year of supervised release and ordered to pay
$72,193 in restitution to the Internal Revenue Service.
Pitts was indicted in August 2006 and charged with 21
counts of making false and fraudulent statements to the
IRS. According to court documents, in 2003, while
working as a tax return preparer in Shreveport, Pitts
prepared numerous false 2003 federal income tax. The
false federal income tax returns prepared by Pitts
sought refunds totaling $106,309. In January 2007, Pitts
pleaded guilty to one count of making false and
fraudulent statements.
Former CPA Sentenced to 51
Months in Prison
On May 23, 2007, in Portland, Ore.,
Harry Nels Kyllo, former certified public accountant
(CPA), was sentenced to 51 months in prison to be
followed by three years of supervised release. In
January 2007, Kyllo pleaded guilty to one count each of
mail fraud, tax evasion and impersonation of an IRS
employee. Kyllo was a CPA until his license was revoked
by the Oregon State Board of Accountancy on September
30, 2003. At the plea hearing, Kyllo admitted that from
about 2000 to 2003, he devised a scheme to defraud some
of his tax preparation clients, the IRS, and the Oregon
Department of Revenue. The IRS and the Oregon Department
of Revenue suffered lost tax revenue because of the
thefts. Individual victim losses ranged from several
thousand dollars up to $390,000.
Texas Tax Preparer Sentenced
to 18 Years in Prison
On Feb. 16, 2007, in Austin, Texas,
Jonathan Marshall Sr. was sentenced to 18 years in
prison and ordered to pay $5,724 for the cost of
prosecution for preparing fraudulent tax returns for
clients. In addition to the prison term, he was ordered
not to prepare or assist in preparing tax returns while
in federal prison. Marshall was convicted of 40 tax
fraud charges in November 2006. The jury found that from
2000-2005, Marshall placed false dependents and false
business income or losses on his clients? tax returns in
order to qualify them for larger tax refunds. The
majority of his illegal tax scheme involved falsely
qualifying his clients for the Earned Income Credit.
Cincinnati Tax Preparer
Sentenced for Preparing Fraudulent Tax Returns
On Dec. 1, 2006, in Cincinnati, Ohio,
Walter Daulton was sentenced to 46 months in prison
followed by one year of supervised release and ordered
to pay a $1,500 fine for willfully aiding and assisting
in the preparation of federal income tax returns which
were false and fraudulent. According to testimony
presented at trial, Daulton, a self-described truck tax
expert, gave seminars at truck stops and trucking
companies and prepared fraudulent income tax returns for
truck drivers. On many of his clients' tax returns, he
reported numerous fictitious expenses that his clients
had neither paid nor incurred. The fictitious expenses
included commissions, fees, gifts to charity, tarping
and untarping fees, and other business expenses.
Return Prepared Sentenced to
48 Months in Prison for Conspiracy to Defraud the US
On Oct. 19, 2006, in Tucson, Ariz.,
Luis C. Deguzman Jr. was sentenced to 48 months in
prison to be followed by three years of supervised
release and ordered to pay $416,965 in restitution to
the IRS. On June 14, 2006, Deguzman was found guilty by
a federal jury of conspiring to defraud the United
States by filing false claims for income tax refunds.
Evidence at trial showed that Deguzman told clients he
could obtain large income tax refunds to be placed in a
trust for the future benefit of their family and a
charity of their choice. He claimed to have connections
with the IRS which permitted him to gain special
approval to use a loophole in the tax code in order to
fund a charitable remainder trust for clients. Deguzman
prepared the alleged trust documents and the client?s
tax return. Without the client?s knowledge, he inflated
the charitable contributions and sometimes added other
false deductions. He would sometimes have the entire tax
refund sent to accounts he controlled rather than the
client?s. In the promotion of the fraudulent charitable
trust scheme, Deguzman attempted to defraud the IRS of
$455,985. Several of Deguzman's clients reported him to
the IRS.
Federal Court Orders Halt to
Nationwide ?Tax Termination? Scheme
On Aug. 9, 2007, a federal court
permanently barred Robert L. Schulz of Queensbury, N.Y.,
and his organizations, We the People Congress and We the
People Foundation, from promoting a tax scheme that
helped employers and employees improperly stop tax
withholding from wages. The court said Schulz ?relied on
fringe opinions of known tax protestors whose theories
have repeatedly been rejected by courts across the
country.? The court further noted that several of those
tax protestors were convicted of tax crimes.
South Carolina Court Bars
?Patriot? Group From Promoting Tax Schemes
On July 3, 2007, a federal judge
permanently barred Robert Barnwell Clarkson and his
so-called "Patriot Network" from promoting tax-fraud
schemes. The court detailed Clarkson?s efforts to
interfere with tax collection, including his
instructions to transfer property to nominees and to sue
IRS agents who attempt to collect taxes.
Federal Court Bars Georgia
Man from Promoting ?Absurd? Tax Scheme
On Aug. 31, 2007, a federal court
permanently barred Derrick Sanders of Atlanta from
promoting a tax fraud scheme involving false claims.
According to the complaint, Sanders' customers were
advised they were not liable for income tax because they
belonged to a purported Native American group, the
so-called Yamassee Native American Tribe. The court
noted that after it preliminarily enjoined Sanders in
2006 he "refused to back down from his absurd contention
that the Yamassee are ... exempt from federal income
taxes."
Where Do You Report Suspected
Tax Fraud Activity?
If you suspect tax fraud or know of
an abusive return preparer, report this activity using
IRS Form 3949-A, Information Referral. You can download
Form 3949-A from the Web site at IRS.gov or call
1-800-829-3676 to order by mail. Send the completed
form, or a letter detailing the alleged fraudulent
activity, to Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888.
Please include specific information about who you are
reporting, the activity you are reporting and how you
became aware of it, when the alleged violation took
place, the amount of money involved and any other
information that might be helpful to an investigation.
Although you are not required to identify yourself, it
is helpful to do so. Your identity can be kept
confidential. You may also be entitled to a reward.


|
|